Legal Opinion
Crescent Co. of Spartanburg, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 2, 1976No. 20228PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
Appellant, the Crescent Company of Spartanburg, a land development company, contracted with respondent, Insurance Company of North America (INA), for insurance coverage for houses under construction. Several houses owned by appellant were allegedly vandalized and it sought compensation. INA denied liability, contending coverage was barred by certain exclusions in the policy, and moved for and was granted summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
' In April, 1972, INA issued a fire insurance policy .to the Crescent Company. The Crescent Company paid an added premium…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pitts v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- Ellis v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Gardner v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Johnson v. Wabash Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Spencer v. Republic National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Crown Life Ins. Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. MARINE CONTRACTING AND TOWING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- National Discount Shoes, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Hudson v. Zenith Engraving Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- Walter Myers v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company, an Insurance Company Doing Business in IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.