Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Campbell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 12, 1971No. 19321PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice:

The defendant Campbell is an insurance agent employed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. On August 24, 1967, plaintiff sustained certain injuries when an automobile owned and operated by Campbell collided with plaintiff’s parked vehicle. In this action plaintiff seeks to recover against Campbell and against Metropolitan under the doctrine of respondeat superior.

Pursuant to Circuit Court Rule No. 44, Metropolitan moved for summary judgment on the ground that Camp bell was not acting as the agent, servant or employee of Metropolitan at the time of the collision and there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  2. City of Summerville v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Williams v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Crescent Co. of Spartanburg, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Dalon v. Golden Lanes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Jamison v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Eagle Const. Co., Inc. v. Richland Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Moshtaghi v. the CitadelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API