Legal Opinion

Honts v. Shaw

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided September 8, 1998No. 03-98-00217-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

Appellants Bob Honts and Herman “Tex” Moten, Sr., filed an election contest challeng*818ing the outcome of the Republican primary-election held on March 10, 1998, for the Republican nomination of County Commissioner, Precinct Two and Precinct Chairman, Election Precinct 250. The district court rendered judgment upholding the election and declaring appellee Jim Shaw as the Republican nominee for County Commissioner and appellee Mark A. Wallace as Election Precinct 250 Chairman. We will affirm the trial court’s judgment.

THE CONTROVERSY

The following matters are uncontested. On…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hines v. HashTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Chisholm v. Bewley MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Countz v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. $435,000.00Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Alvarez v. Espinoza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Villarreal, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  2. Reese v. Duncan, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  3. In Re the Talco-Bogata Consolidated Independent School District Bond Election, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Dear, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  5. Bielamowicz v. Cedar Hill Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API