Legal Opinion

State v. $435,000.00

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1992No. D-1592PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

Since 1955, the Legislature has by various statutes prescribed certain procedures for judicial proceedings to forfeit property seized in illicit drug trafficking. Until 1989, those statutes provided that after the State initiated a forfeiture action and a claimant filed a verified answer to recover the property, “a time for hearing on forfeiture shall be set within 30 days” of the filing of the answer.1 Shortly before the Legislature eliminated this provision, a conflict arose among the courts of appeals over its proper application. As it appears that a significant number of cases remain to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. United States v. Montalvo-MurilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. Von NeumannSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hines v. HashTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. BarrettTexas Supreme Court · 2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API