Hines v. Hash
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HECHT, Justice.
The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices— Consumer Protection Act provides that “[a]s a prerequisite to filing a suit seeking damages” under the Act, “a consumer shall give written notice” to the defendant of his complaint. Tex.Bus. & Com.Code § 17.-505(a). We granted writ of error in this case to consider the proper application of this provision.
Dutch Hines sued C.W. Hash, Jr. for damages under the DTPA, complaining that the roof Hash had installed on his home leaked. In his original petition Hines alleged that notice of his claim had been sent to Hash by certified mail,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Cail v. Service Motors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Weirich v. WeirichTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Schepps v. Presbyterian Hospital of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ValenciaTexas Supreme Court · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Transport Insurance Co. v. FairclothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Albertson's, Inc. v. SinclairTexas Supreme Court · 1999
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.