Legal Opinion

Cox v. Dine-A-Mate, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1998No. COA97-1157PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Defendants assign error to the trial court’s denial of defendants’ motion to dismiss, contending that the trial court should have enforced the forum selection clause in plaintiff’s employment agreement with Dine-A-Mate. First, we examine whether the appeal on this issue is properly before the Court. Generally, a party has no right to appeal an interlocutory order. N.C. Dept. of Transportation v. Page, 119 N.C. App. 730, 733, 460 S.E.2d 332, 334 (1995). However, “an appeal is permitted under N.C. Gen. Stat. § l-277(a) and 7A-27(d)(l) if the trial court’s decision deprives the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. PageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Welcome Wagon International, Inc. v. PenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Perkins v. CCH Computax, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. HENLEY PAPER COMPANY v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Analog Devices, Inc. v. MichalskiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Cable Tel Services, Inc. v. Overland Contracting, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Howard v. Oakwood Homes Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API