Legal Opinion

HENLEY PAPER COMPANY v. McAllister

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1960No. 602PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The superior court did not assign its reasons for sustaining the demurrer to the evidence and for dismissing the action. The plaintiff contended the restrictive covenant in the contract was entered, into at the time and as a part of the consideration for the original employment, and remained in force so long as defendant remained in plaintiff’s employment. The plaintiff further contended the contract, because of the character of the business and knowledge thereof by the defendant, was reasonable, both as to time and territory, and should be enforced by injunction.

The defendant contended (1)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Roberts v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Roberts v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Tobacco Growers Cooperative Ass'n v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Cooperative Assn. v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Visionair, Inc. v. James & Colossus Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Medical Staffing Network, Inc. v. RidgwayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Manpower of Guilford County, Inc. v. HedgecockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Whittaker General Medical Corp. v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Welcome Wagon International, Inc. v. PenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API