Legal Opinion
Cable Tel Services, Inc. v. Overland Contracting, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 17, 2002No. COA01-1318PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSON, Judge.
The issue on this appeal is whether certain clauses in the parties’ contract prohibit North Carolina courts from exercising jurisdiction over an action for a breach of that contract. The trial court ruled that they did not. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Plaintiff Cable Tel Services, Inc. (Cable Tel) and defendants Overland Contracting, Inc. (Overland) and Black and Veatch, LLP (Black and Veatch) entered into a contract in 1998 whereby plaintiff was to perform construction work on a television cable installation project. The following two clauses appeared in the parties’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tanglewood Land Co., Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Johnston County v. R. N. Rouse & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Bueltel v. Lumber Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Bundy v. . Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Internet East, Inc. v. Duro Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Rafael Rodriguez Barril, Inc. v. Conbraco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Se. Caissons, LLC v. Choate Constr. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Szymczyk v. Signs Now Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Schwarz v. St. Jude Med., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Triad Packaging, Inc. v. SupplyOne, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2013
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.