Trudell v. Seven Lakes Heating & Air Conditioning Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Plaintiff’s appeal does not challenge the sufficiency of the Commission’s Findings of Fact. Plaintiff rather challenges its conclusion that his injury was not caused by an “accident.” The issue, therefore, is whether the Commission’s award is justified by its findings. Buck v. Procter & Gamble Co., 52 N.C. App. 88, 278 S.E. 2d 268 (1981). We conclude it is.
Mere injury does not entitle an employee to compensation under North Carolina’s Workers’ Compensation Act. Bigelow v. Tire Sales Co., 12 N.C. App. 220, 182 S.E. 2d 856 (1971). The injury must result from an accident arising…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Porter v. Shelby Knit, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Edwards v. . Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Buck v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Bigelow v. Tire Sales CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gunter v. Dayco Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Poe v. Acme BuildersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Bowles v. CTS of Asheville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Dye v. Shippers Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Shay v. ROWAN SALISBURY SCHOOLSCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.