Legal Opinion

Irons v. American National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 9, 1932No. 8583PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. The general rule is that the courts of this State have no extraterritorial jurisdiction, and can not hold citizens of other States amenable to its process, or bind them by a judgment in personam, without their consent. Gordy v. Levison, 157 Ga. 670 (122 S. E. 234), and cit. And see, to the same effect, Adams v. Lamar, 8 Ga. 83 (2); Dearing v. Bank of Charleston, 5 Ga. 497, 503 (48 Am. D. 300); Beasley v. Lennox-Haldeman Co., 116 Ga. 13 (42 S. E. 385); Meeks v. Roan, 117 Ga. 865, 866 (45 S. E. 252); Martin v. Gaissert, 134 Ga. 34, 40 (67 S. E. 536); Warlick v. Reynolds, 151 N. C. 606 (66 S.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dearing v. Bank of CharlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  2. Adams v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  3. Martin v. GaissertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Warlick v. H. P. Reynolds & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Gordy v. Levison & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James Talcott, Inc. v. Allahabad Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Irons v. American National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Webb & Martin Inc. v. Anderson-Mcgriff Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Sternbergh v. McClureSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  5. Peeples v. MullinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API