Legal Opinion

Peeples v. Mullins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1933No. 9300PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. “The general rule is that the courts of this State have no extraterritorial jurisdiction, and can not hold citizens of other States amenable to its process, or bind them by a judgment in personam, without their consent.” Irons v. American National Bank, 175 Ga. 552 (165 S. E. 741), and cit.

2. The court did not err in setting' aside the order declaring service perfected by publication on the defendant Mullins, and in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Gobi & Bright and George G. McCoy, for plaintiff. Abrahams, Bouhan,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irons v. American National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Irons v. American National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Webb & Martin Inc. v. Anderson-Mcgriff Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Pendley v. TumlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API