Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 8, 2009No. 60197-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

¶1 Despite claims of insanity and/or diminished capacity, George Johnson, Jr., was convicted of three counts of bank robbery. He contends the trial court improperly limited expert testimony concerning his defenses and improperly instructed the jury about diminished capacity. Johnson also appeals his sentence, arguing that certain prior convictions should not have counted as “strikes” under the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, chapter 9.94A RCW; that the State should have been required to prove his prior convictions to the jury beyond a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Volk v. DeMeerleerWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Tamisha Pearson v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State v. LANGSTEADCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. State v. LangsteadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API