Legal Opinion

State v. Langstead

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 12, 2010No. 61869-5-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 Appellant Robert Langstead is a recidivist whose sentence for robbery was aggravated to life without parole because he had at least two prior convictions for robbery. The State did not have to prove Langstead’s prior convictions to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, as would be required if the prior conviction were an element of the crime rather than an aggravating factor in sentencing. We conclude there is a rational basis for treating the two categories of recidivists differently. Accordingly, we reject Langstead’s claim of an equal protection violation.

¶2 The State charged Langstead with…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State v. EnquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State Of Washington v. Alan D. JenksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Benjamin J. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API