TE Connolly, Inc. v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against it pursuant to an order sustaining a general and special demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend the pleading. The suit was for injunction against an alleged threatened enforcement of payment of registration fees and penalties for temporarily operating six oversized “trae-truks” upon the public highways. After determining that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, the court said, “If counsel desires to amend the complaint leave to do so will be granted. ’ ’ In response to that permission to amend the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Carley & Hamilton, Inc. v. Snook Chief of the Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Camas Stage Co. v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Whyte v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Northwest Auto Co. v. HurlburtOregon Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Galanis v. Mercury Internat. Ins. UnderwritersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Ryan v. Mike-Ron Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Morrison v. Home Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Newell v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1982