Legal Opinion

Newell v. National Bank of Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1982No. 5437PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIMOND, Senior Justice.

Appellant Leslie Newell brought this action against Ray and Samantha Charlton, the National Bank of Alaska (NBA), and one other party in connection with the default by the Charltons on a promissory note which they had executed in favor of Newell when they purchased his mobile home or house trailer 1 in 1978. The suit against the Charltons sought judgment against them on the note, and asserted a lien against the mobile home which, Newell contended, served as security on the promissory note. NBA was later joined as a party in the suit when Newell learned that NBA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Christian v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State, Department of Revenue v. Debenham Electric Supply Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Allred v. J. C. Engelman, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. TE Connolly, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re GrayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API