Brosterhous, Coleman & Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
DiCARLO, Judge:
Plaintiffs, Brosterhous, Coleman & Co., and Lurgi Chemie und Hlittentechnik GmbH, challenge the valuation and classification of components of a chlorine dioxide bleach plant imported for integration into a paper-making operation in the United States. The action is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1982).
The Court holds that the proper basis for calculating transaction value is the prices Lurgi agreed to pay its vendors for the components of the plant. The Court also holds that Customs properly declined…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- E.C. McAfee Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- KMW Johnson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nissho Iwai American Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Nissho Iwai American Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Nissho Iwai American Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993