Legal Opinion
Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 31, 1995No. Civ. 3-95-436, 3-95-454PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs commenced these actions seeking a determination and recovery of benefits purportedly due them under several benefits plans established by their employer, Defendant Little Six, Inc. (“LSI”). Plaintiffs’ claims arise under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1500. Plaintiffs seek declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132. This matter is currently before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to Dis miss…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc., James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Alton J. Smart v. State Farm Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gavle v. Little Six, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Armstrong v. Mille Lacs County Sheriffs Dept.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.