Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Mille Lacs County Sheriffs Dept.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 2, 2000No. CIV. 98-2658 RLEPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the consent of the parties, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), upon the Motion of the Defendants Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department, Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians, and Marc R. Gabinger (hereinafter the “Mille Lacs Defendants”), to Stay All Proceedings Pending an Adjudication of Matters of Tribal Law.
A Hearing on the Motion was conducted on December 23, 1999, at which time, the Plaintiffs appeared by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ruszczyk v. NoorDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Armstrong v. Mille Lacs County Sheriffs DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Bank One, N.A. v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Archambault v. The United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- Benchmark Insurance Company v. SUNZ Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.