Legal Opinion
Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 30, 2003No. CIV. 02-04741(DSD/SRN)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon defendants’ objections to the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan R. Nelson, dated August 4, 2003. Defendants object to the report and recommendation on three grounds: (1) that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claims because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) does not apply to defendants, (2) that the court must defer to the determination of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community Court that no ERISA plan exists, and (3) that defendants…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fortune Bay Resort CasinoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Leonard Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004