Legal Opinion
Tucker Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Grossman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1963No. 17619PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, District Judge.
This is an action by Abraham Gross-man (hereinafter Grossman) and Glide Windows, Inc., (hereinafter Glide Windows) against Tucker Aluminum Products, Inc., (hereinafter Tucker) for an injunction and damages as a result of an alleged infringement of a patent. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1338 (1958), pertaining to the jurisdiction of the district courts in civil actions arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (4) (1958) pertaining to the jurisdiction of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paraffine Companies, Inc. v. McEverlast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Philco Corporation v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
- Marvin Edwin Whiteman v. L. G. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Chicopee Manufacturing Corp. v. Columbus Fiber Mills Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1958
- Rown v. Brake Testing Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Amerio Contact Plate Freezers, Inc. v. Belt-Ice Corporation and Frank W. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1967
- Kalvar Corporation v. Xidex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.