Legal Opinion
Rown v. Brake Testing Equipment Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1930No. 5939PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
Below, the appellees and the appellant were, respectively, plaintiffs and defendant, and herein they will be so designated. One of the plaintiffs is the owner of Brennan patent, No. 1,264,770, and the other is a licensee thereunder. The defendant, who, in his automobile shop at San Francisco, uses a brake-testing device, known as the “Jumbo,” and manufactured by the Price-Hollister Company of Rockford, 111., is sued upon the ground that he thus infringes the patent. The only claim presently involved is No. 1, which the lower court held valid and infringed. It is as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Brush v. ConditSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Jenner v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Sipp Electric & Machine Co. v. Atwood-Morrison Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- The Delaware and Hudson Railway Company v. United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. IrelanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Paraffine Companies, Inc. v. McEverlast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.