Legal Opinion

Sylvan Properties Co. v. State Planning Office

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 13, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State Planning Office and Evan Richert appeal from a declaratory judgment in the Superior Court (Penobscot County) determining that the restrictive covenant in a deed from Sylvan Properties (Sylvan) was ambiguous (Marden, J.) and that the State’s proposed development of a statewide landfill on the property violates the terms of the covenant {Mills, J.). Because we conclude that the restrictive covenant language is unambiguous, and that the proposed landfill does not violate the covenant, we vacate the judgment.

[¶2] The restrictive covenant at issue was contained…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Blance v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Reed v. AC McLoon & CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. McLellan v. McFaddenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
  5. Gillespie v. WorcesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eaton v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Jeffrey R. Mabee et al. v. Nordic Aquafarms Inc. et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  3. Bennett v. TracySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Debra Morgan et al. v. Erik S. TownsendSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  5. Eaton v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API