Legal Opinion

Blance v. Alley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 3, 1979PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

This appeal requires us to focus upon the doctrine of the law of the case because of the unusual circumstance that both Plaintiff and Defendants seek to invoke that doctrine in support of their respective positions herein.

Rupert Blance, the Plaintiff’s late husband and predecessor in title, commenced this action in Superior Court on July 16, 1969, seeking in that part of Gouldsboro known as Prospect Harbor to establish the common boundary between certain land of the Defendants, Austin M. Alley and Helen M. Alley, and a triangular lot to which Blance claimed title.

By their…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. White v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  5. Mangold v. BaconSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Wage Payment LitigationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Colony Cadillac & Oldsmobile, Inc. v. YerdonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Arn H. Pearson v. Mary Lou WendellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  5. Lord v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API