Gillespie v. Worcester
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
This complaint sought to compel the defendant to convey certain real estate owned by him to the plaintiff under the theory that the realty in question was owned by the defendant subject to an option to purchase the same running in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant denied the existence of any legal right by which the plaintiff could compel such a conveyance.
Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(1), M.R.C.P., a Referee was appointed who heard the case “on [the] complaint, answer, agreed facts and argument of counsel,” and found in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff seasonably…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shapiro Bros. Shoe Co. v. Lewiston-Auburn Shoeworkers Protective Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Johnson v. American Automobile InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
- C COMPANY v. City of WestbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Conner v. HendrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Union Water Power Co. v. Inhabitants of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Badger v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Cushing v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Rhoda v. FitzpatrickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Jones v. CarrierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Mount Desert Yacht Yard, Inc. v. PhillipsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.