Legal Opinion
St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Tulsa County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 19, 1935No. 25812PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
The question involved in con neetion with protestants’ appeal is the authority of the excise board to apportion the maximum millage rate of levy to the county and to the cities, towns, and school districts of the county in the manner as reflected by the following order made by that board:
“Motion was made by Merritt J. Glass, seconded by G. Ed Warren, that the 15 mills available for allocation to all municipalities of Tulsa county be made in the following-manner: That the county levy for all purposes other than the sinking fund be four and five-eighths (4%) mills; that in cities and school…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Protest of Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Protest of Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Board of County Commissioners v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Tulsa County Excise Board v. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Wilson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.