Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Bemiss

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1884No. 164PublishedCited by 80 opinions

APPEALS FROM THE' SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mtt.t.er

Laura J. Bemiss, widow of John Bemiss, having a claim against the United States pending before the commission commonly called the Southern Claims Commission, under the act of March 3d, 1871, employed George Taylor and F. C. Wood, attorneys-at-law, residing in Washington city,. to prosecute said claim, and by an instrument in writing agreed to give them fifty per cent, of the amount which might be recovered. The sum recovered was $27,310.00, and, under a power of attorney given by her to Mr. Taylor, he received from the Treasury the sum of $14,598.33, and Mrs. Bemiss the balance of $12,711.67.

T…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Wyman v. HalsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Nutt v. KnutSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Jules E. Angoff v. Bernard Goldfine, Harold Brown v. Bernard GoldfineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  5. Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API