Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Martin v. Bexley City School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1988No. 87-880PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

The primary issue in this case is a simple one: In a mandamus action to recover compensation for a period of wrongful discharge from employment of a public employee, does the employer bear the burden of establishing with reasonable certainty the amount that the employee could have earned in. appropriate employment during the period of exclusion? We answer this query affirmatively and therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on this issue.

I

A reinstated public employee may maintain an action in mandamus to recover compensation due for a period of wrongful exclusion from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State ex rel. Martin v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Hamlin v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Carver v. HullOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Couch v. Trimble Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API