Legal Opinion

Questar Data Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 11, 1996No. C9-95-1880PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Questar Data System, Inc. (Questar), petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the Minnesota Tax Court affirming the Commissioner of Revenue’s (Commissioner) use tax and interest assess*927ment in the amount of $147,594.33.1 The assessment was based on unpaid use tax allegedly owed by Questar for the tax period October 1,1989, through September 30,1992. According to the Commissioner, Questar is a provider of research services and failed to pay the required use tax on certain printed materials used in providing research services to its customers.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. A.B. Hirschfeld Press, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Homart Development Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. State, Department of Revenue & TaxationIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robinson & Muenster Associates, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Community Memorial Home at Osakis, Minnesota, Inc. v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Great Lakes Gas Transmission L.P. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Webster v. Hennepin Cnty.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API