People v. Crosby
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Lewis R. Kirby, Oval Pirkey, and Eugene Daney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of rape, and appeals from the judgment whereby he was sentenced to state prison for a term of twenty years.
Respondent insists that defendant is not entitled to a review of the alleged errors presented herein, for the reason that no appeal was taken from the final judgment. After defendant’s counsel had made a purported motion for a new trial and motion in arrest of judgment, both of which were overruled, the court pronounced its judgment; whereupon counsel for defendant said: “At this time I would like to give notice of appeal, to the court and district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. ShearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. DerwaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. CassandrasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. EdgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Clark v. FosterIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. WojahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. LawlorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.