Legal Opinion

United States v. John M. Larosa and Esther C. Larosa

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 20, 1985No. 84-1585PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

The United States brought this action in the district court seeking to reform a deed that had conveyed property to the government in order to make the deed conform to the actual common boundary line plotted out on the ground. The district court, pursuant to rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, found that there was no just cause for delay in entering judgment and directed entry of judgment for the United States. We affirm.

I

In the mid-1950’s, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Army Corps”) began to plan the construction of the Cecil M. Hardin…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Lindsey v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Mishawaka St. Joseph. L. T. Co. v. Neu, Gdn.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Ross v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Land Holdings of Indiana v. Stanley JobeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp. v. Wp Properties, 98-0125 (2001)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  3. Westdale Northwest Center, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. Westdale Northwest Center, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API