Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 1995No. CF94-0457; CA A86754PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The state appeals from an order suppressing evidence. We reverse and remand.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendant resided on rural property owned by Ralph Tachella. Tachella retained an unrestricted right of access to that property. Tachella saw defendant bring onto the property a tool box, which Tachella believed had been stolen. Tachella called the police and spoke to Deputy Rowan. Tachella told Rowan that he had seen defendant bring the tool box onto the property and that he thought it had been stolen. At Tachella’s invitation, Rowan went to the property, saw the tool box in plain view,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. Trevino/AhumadaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CreightonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API