Legal Opinion

State v. Creighton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 31, 1996No. 94-09-36407; CA A86846PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession of controlled substances. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We reverse and remand.

During the evening of September 16,1994, Portland Police Officer Moylan saw defendant on a Portland street and, having known him for three to six months, engaged him in conversation. Later that night, Moylan learned that defendant was named on an outstanding felony warrant for a parole violation.

About 1:00 p'.m. the next day, Moylan saw defendant talking with some people on a downtown Portland street. Defendant was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. HerrinOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. BogartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. StinstromCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API