Legal Opinion

State v. Trevino/Ahumada

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 1995No. C 92-07-34160; CA A78538 (Control); C 92-07-34159; CA A78539PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendants were charged with multiple counts of delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence found in warrantless searches of different locations. We reverse and remand.

These facts are not in dispute. Portland police were investigating Stevens for distributing cocaine. On June 23, 1992, Officer Keist received information from a confidential informant that Stevens was going to Gresham that evening to purchase cocaine. Police setup surveillance on Stevens. Later that evening, Stevens left his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. KostaOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API