Bell v. Stowe
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff in error, also plaintiff below, instituted this action in the district court of Douglas county to obtain judgment against the defendants for the sum óf §1,231.66, together with interest thereon at ten per cent per annum from August 16,1891. The claim for such, judgment was based upon a promissory note of date May 16, 1891, due ninety days after date, and in the amount claimed, alleged in the petition to have been executed and delivered by defendants to the bank of which plaintiff afterwards was appointed receiver. The answer, in so far as we need particularly notice it here, was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rose v. MunfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Rainbolt v. StrangNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- New England Mortgage Security Co. v. SandfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCready v. PhillipsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- General Fiberglass Supply, Inc. v. RoemerNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co. v. AldrichNebraska Supreme Court · 1897