Legal Opinion

Rose v. Munford

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1893No. 4537PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Saunders county. Heard below before Post, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This action was brought by Emma H. Bose to foreclose a mortgage executed by C. C. Munford and wife. To the suit Whitfield Sanford, W. H. Dickinson, and others were made parties defendant. Sanford filed an answer and cross-petition, setting up his mortgage on the premises given by the Munfords, and Dickinson likewise filed an answer and cross-petition, setting up his mortgage made by the same parties. To the cross-petition of Dickinson, Munford answered, pleading duress. To Sanford’s cross-petition Munford filed an answer which, after admitting *149the execution of the notes and mortgage, alleges…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. Reynolds, Wilder & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Hager v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. BrohmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Leonard v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Patten Package Co. v. HouserSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. McCready v. PhillipsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sanford v. LundquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Steen v. StretchNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Bell v. StoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API