Legal Opinion

New England Mortgage Security Co. v. Sandford

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Adams county. Tried below before Morris, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This action was brought in the district court of Adafns county to foreclose a mortgage, the amount claimed to be due thereon being the sum of $250, with a small amount of interest. The defendant Sandford filed an answer to the petition as follows: “The defendant, James M. Sandford, answering for himself, states that the note mentioned and described in plaintiff’s petition was given .to plaintiff in pursuance of an agreement between said plaintiff and said defendant, that .said plaintiff should lend the defendant money at the rate of ten per cent per annum.” “ 2. That the defendant received…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of the United States v. Waggener and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Fiedler v. . DarrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Manning v. . TylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Pomeroy v. AinsworthNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Reed v. CoaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCready v. PhillipsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Rainbolt v. StrangNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bell v. StoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co. v. AldrichNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API