McCready v. Phillips
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
This case was before the court at a former term, and a judgment for the plaintiff was then reversed for error in the instructions and insufficiency of the evidence to sustain a recovery under the allegations of the petition. (McCready v. Phillips, 44 Neb. 790.) After the case liad been remanded to the district court amended pleadings were filed. A trial was had on the issues so presented, and there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $6,000. The defendant again prosecutes proceedings in error.
The amended petition is framed on an entirely different theory than the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Dowd v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
- Johnson v. GulickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Ayres v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
- Wilson v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Cerny v. Paxton & Gallagher Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Kritzer v. MoffatWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Yoder v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Adams v. BarberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.