Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Tanner

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1931No. Docket No. 182Published

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Respondent was the owner of an orange grove near the city of Corona in the county of Riverside. She was also the owner of 75% shares of the capital stock of the Temescal Water Company. This stock was found in the possession of appellant and upon his refusal to deliver it to her, this action was brought to compel the cancellation of certificate number 3725 issued for it, and the issuance of a duplicate by the Water Company. Judgment was entered for respondent, and appellant has prosecuted this appeal:

Appellant presents two grounds upon which he bases his claim for a reversal of the judgment;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shafer v. LacyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. E. Bastheim Co. v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. McLean v. MooserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API