Legal Opinion

Hirschy v. Coodley

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1953No. Civ. 19254Published

1Opinion of the Court

116 Cal.App.2d 102 (1953)

DELBERT HIRSCHY, Appellant,

v.

EUGENE L. COODLEY, Respondent.

Civ. No. 19254.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three.

Feb. 16, 1953.

J. F. Rosen and Harry Wolpin for Appellant.

Title & Tannenbaum and Julius M. Title for Respondent.

VALLEE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered on an order sustaining a demurrer to the second amended complaint, referred to as the complaint, without leave to amend.

The facts alleged are these: Plaintiff and Charlotte Hirschy are, and at all times pertinent were, husband and wife. Between March 1 and July 21,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Carter v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Opitz v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Turner v. HeavrinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API