Legal Opinion

McKee v. Standard Minerals Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 22, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The Dissolution Case.

If the defendant’s charter was revived by proceedings under Section 73 of the act, a receiver for it ás a dissolved *99corporation could not of course be appointed. It is admitted that a certificate was filed with the Secretary of State, which, if the facts therein recited are true, show all proper steps to have been taken necessary to revive and continue the charter. The complainant contends, however, that the certificate of renewal, accepted and filed by the Secretary of State and duly recorded, should be treated as a nullity, because, it is contended, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McBride v. MurphyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
  2. Ozan Lumber Co. v. Davis Sewing Mach. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
  3. Auburn Button Wks. v. Perryman Elec. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. Ozan Lumber Co. v. Davis Sewing Mach. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
  5. State v. U. S. Realty Improvement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1926

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Drug, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
  2. Fehl v. S. W. C. Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  3. Syracuse Trust Co. v. KellerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
  4. Pereira v. CoganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. Berwick v. Associated Gas & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API