Legal Opinion

Hunter v. McLaughlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Decatur Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

The appellant Hunter sued the appellee on two promissory notes, made by the appellee, payable to the appellant Lugenbell, in a bank, and indorsed by him to Hunter, and also to foreclose a mortgage executed by the appellee to Lugenbell to secure the payment of said notes. The notes were dated the 13th day of November, 1866; one of them matured in six and the other in twelve months after date. There was a paragraph of the complaint on each of the notes. A payment’of six hundred and sixty-five dollars was made on the note first maturing, on the 13th day of February, 1867, by the appellee to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Hardesty v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Kernodle v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  4. Frear v. BryanIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Johnson v. McCabeIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. Standley v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. First National Bank v. RuhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. MahonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API