Legal Opinion

Kernodle v. Hunt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1835PublishedCited by 18 opinions

ERROR, to the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

Debt by Kernodle as assignee of Norris against Hunt upon two promissory notes. The material allegations of the declaration are:—That Hunt made his certain promissory note, &c. to said Norris, by which he promised to pay, &c. 100 dollars for value received, &c.; and that he made his certain other promissory note, &c. to said Norris, by which he promised to pay, &c. 65 dollars, &c. upon condition that Moses Mendenhall’s patent perpendicular grist mill plan should be a good and useful plan; if not, said last-mentioned note should be void, &c.; with an averment that the said patent perpendicular…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boone v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. McClure v. JeffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Conwell v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API