Legal Opinion

Hardesty v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1851PublishedCited by 22 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

Perkins, J. —

Debt by Hardesty against Smith, upon sealed notes for the payment of money. The notes were made payable to Artemis Wood, and were by him assigned to one Isham, and by said Isham to the plaintiff.

The defendant pleaded — 1. That the sole consideration of said notes ‘‘was the sale and assignment from one Cyrus Isham, to the said defendant, of the full and exclusive right and liberty of making, constructing, using, and vending to others to be used, a certain supposed improvement in the lamp, described in a certain schedule attached to, and forming a part of, said sale and transfer,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kernodle v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Johnson v. M'LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  3. Pollard v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1803

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Wiley v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Vigo Agricultural Society v. BrumfielIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Paulus v. LattaIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Love v. OldhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API