Legal Opinion

Tyre v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1925No. 6 Div. 545PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

The defendant was convicted under the act approved September 30, 1919 (Acts 1919, p. 1086), of having in his possession a “still, apparatus, appliance, or a device or substitute therefor, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages,” and sentenced to a term in the penitentiary.

The case made for the state was that the defendant, with his wife, resided in a three-room house, and that in the loft, over one of the rooms of this house, there was found a still cap, worm, and condenser, and that some one or more of1 these articles was or were an article or articles…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Taylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Veal v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Childers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Haynes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tyre v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Tyxe v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Young v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API