Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1924No. 8 Div. 244PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The facts as testified to by the prosecutrix in this case do not, in our opinion, make -out a case of assault with intent to ravish. Taken in the most unfavorable light against defendant the testimony of the alleged injured party tends to show an indecent and unlawful assault upon her by this appellant, but this evidence does not make out the necessary intent on his part to have intercourse with her by forcé, or fear, and against her consent. It tends rather to show that his intent was to obtain her consent to his having sexual intercourse with her, and that when he became convinced that he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
  2. Gaines v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Clayton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Curry v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Meadows v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Cox v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API