Legal Opinion

Veal v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1923No. 4 Div. 792PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

The indictment was against the defendant and another. On 'the trial the other defehdant was acquitted, and this defendant alone prosecutes this appeal.

There were numerous objections and exceptions to the introduction of evidence, but it will not be necessary to pass upon each exception specifically, other than herein appears.

We have several times held that a witness who knows can state as a collective fact that a certain apparatus found is “a complete still outfit”; his knowledge of whether it is or not being subject to test by cross-examination.

A witness will not be permitted to testify that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Childers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goodman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Purser v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Mason v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API