Young v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SAMFORD, L
The specific charge for which this defendant was tried and convicted was the mixing and making of a quantity of beer, having an alcoholic content and suitable to be used as a beverage. There was sufficient evidence to make this a jury question. The court so charged the jury, and in this there was no error.
Over timely objections and exceptions of defendant, the state was allowed to introduce evidence tending to prove that, after finding the beer down in the woods, the officers continued the search extending to the house, where defendant lived, which was a distance of some 200 yards,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glover v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- McMickens v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- Holland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Cobb v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.