Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. Sedlacek

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2018No. S-17-146PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeavican, C.J.

I. NATURE OF CASE

A former patient sued a psychiatrist for medical malpractice. The psychiatrist moved for summary judgment. The psychiatrist averred that he had met the applicable standard of care and that he had given to the patient all materials in his possession pertaining to the patient's care. The court granted the patient a 90-day continuance of the summary judgment hearing, in order to find an expert witness. The court stayed all discovery and pending motions until the summary judgment hearing or an expert witness indicated the need for more discovery. The patient failed to designate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Patty Precision, a Corporation v. Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co., General Electric Company, and Tools Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. Wilson v. MiskoNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Healy v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Thone v. Regional West Medical CenterNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gaytan v. Wal-MartNebraska Supreme Court · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Mays v. Midnite Dreams, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Bloedorn Lumber Co. of N. Platte, Corp. v. NielsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. George Clift Enters. v. Oshkosh Feedyard Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Mays v. Midnite DreamsNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API