Baty v. Binns
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
Defendants and plaintiff Nannie Baty appeal from judgment for plaintiffs in an automobile negligence action. The primary issue on appeal is whether the doctrine of pure comparative negligence established in Goetzman v. Wichern, 327 N.W.2d 742 (Iowa 1982), must be applied to a case tried to the court before that decision was filed but decided after it was filed. The district court held that it must. We affirm the district court on both appeals.
The action is based on a collision between an automobile driven by plaintiff, Nannie Baty, and an automobile owned by defendants. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Goetzman v. WichernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- City of Davenport v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Hawk v. Jim Hawk Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Osborne v. Iowa Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- C. Mac Chambers Co. v. Iowa Tae Kwon Do Academy, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Algona v. CampneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Schmitz v. Iowa Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
- Rouse v. Union TownshipSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.