Legal Opinion

Goetzman v. Wichern

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 22, 1982No. 66832PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

The question here is whether the common law of Iowa should be changed to substitute the doctrine of comparative negligence for the existing doctrine of contributory negligence. In the present case the trial court *744submitted a contributory negligence defense over an objection by plaintiff in which she advocated the change. We now abandon the doctrine that contributory negligence is a complete bar to recovery. In its place we adopt the doctrine of comparative negligence under which an injured party’s recovery is diminished in proportion to that party’s contributory negligence,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gustafson v. BendaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Harrison v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Tigges v. City of AmessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API